How is a "course of conduct" defined in a stalking context?

In the context of stalking, a "course of conduct" is characterized by a series of two or more acts that demonstrate a continuity of purpose. This definition is critical in distinguishing between benign behaviors and actions that constitute stalking. It emphasizes the pattern of behavior that targets an individual, reflecting an ongoing intent to intimidate, harass, or cause fear.

By requiring at least two acts, the definition acknowledges that isolated incidents may not constitute stalking; rather, it is the cumulative effect of actions that reveal a persistent focus on the victim. This continuity of purpose can manifest in various ways, such as repeated attempts to contact the victim, following them, or monitoring their activities.

In contrast to this definition, other options like a single act of hesitation or an occasional greeting fail to illustrate any persistent behavior and would likely not meet the threshold for stalking. Similarly, a random series of interactions does not imply the necessary intent or continuity that signifies stalking behavior. Thus, the correct answer encapsulates the essence of what constitutes a stalking offense within legal definitions.